Safety Culture
Publications
Illusions
of Safety. Invited position paper for Workshop on Organizational
Analysis in High Hazard Production Systems: An Academy/Industry Dialogue,
MIT Endicott House, April 15-18, 1997, NSF Grant No. 9510883-SBR (C. Perin
and J. S. Carroll).
Workshops
7th
Annual CHPRA Workshop: Lessons Learned from Cross Industry Benchmarking.
June 7th & 8th 2001, Inner Harbor Hotel, Baltimore, Maryland.
"The
Agenda - Grassroots Leaders," Fast Company, Issue 23,
page 114.
Navy commander D. Michael Abrashoff uses a leadership model that's as
progressive as any in business.
"No
Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Case Studies of Incidents and Potential Incidents
Caused by Protective Systems," Process Safety Progress,
Vol. 16, No. 3 (Fall), 1997, pp. 132-139. Article by A. M. Dowell III
and D. C. Hendershot.
"Organizational Factors Associated with Safety and Mission Success
in Aviation Environments," by Ron Westrum and Anthony J. Adamski.
In Handbook of Aviation Human Factors by D. J. Garland, J. A. Wise,
and V. D. Hopkin, (1999).
Available from chpra@engr.wisc.edu
This article examines the organizational factors in aviation safety
and mission success. The organizations involved cover the entire range
of aviation organizations, from airline operations departments to airports,
manufacturing organizations, air traffic control, and corporate flight
departments. Organizational factors include such things as organizational
structure, management, corporate culture, training, and recruitment.
Although the greater part of this article is focused on civil aviation,
it also uses examples from other high-tech systems. We concentrate on
key organizational processes involved in recent studies and major accidents.
Toward Effective Corrective Actions for Programs and Processes
Constance Perin
Second Draft
This paper expands on Constance Perin's talk at the CHPRA workshop,
entitled "Re-modeling Operational Logics," on formal versus
substantive logics. "Formal logics" come from technical specifications,
the design basis, and the rules and procedures that they generate. "Substantive
logics" consist of just about everything else that it takes to
reduce risk -- processes, programs, professional judgment, skill of
the trade, experience, best estimates, and management expectations and
philosophies. Each is equally logical. Emphasizing this fact, not thinking
that they are so different in importance, may help to reduce the conflict
between them.
"Deregulation and Nuclear Power Safety: What Can We Learn from Other
Industries?" Electricity Journal, May 2001, pp. 49-60. By
Vicki Bier,
James Joosten, David Glyer, Jennifer Tracey, and Michael Welsh.
Available from chpra@engr.wisc.edu
This paper expands on Vicki Bier's talk at the CHPRA workshop, on the
effects of deregulation on safety. The paper presents an examination
of the effects of deregulation on safety in the U.S. aviation and rail
industries, and the UK nuclear power industry. The results provide evidence
that changes associated with deregulation can be expected to create
major challenges to the management of safety by the U.S. nuclear power
industry and its safety regulators.
Top of page
Books and Reports
Beyond Aviation Human Factors: Safety in High Technology Systems
Daniel E. Maurino (Editor), Rob E. Lee, Neil Johnston, James Reason.
Ashgate Publishing Company, 1999.
The authors believe that a systemic organizational approach to aviation
safety must replace the piecemeal approaches largely favored in the past.
Accident records show a flattening of the safety curve since the early
1970s. However, instead of new kinds of accidents, similar safety deficiencies
have become recurrent features in accident reports. This suggests the
need to review traditional accident prevention strategies, focused almost
exclusively on the action or inactions of front-line operational personnel.
The organizational model proposed by the authors argues for a broadened
approach, which considers the influence of all organizations involved
in operations (the "blunt end"), in addition to individual human
performance (the "sharp end"). This book is intended to provide
a bridge from the academic knowledge gained from research, to the needs
of practitioners. It comprises six chapters. In the first, the fundamentals,
background, and justification for an organizational approach to aviation
safety and prevention endeavors are explained. Four case studies follow,
which illustrate the application of the organizational accident causation
model to the flight deck, maintenance, and air traffic control environments.
The last chapter suggests different ways to apply the model as a prevention
tool that enhances organizational effectiveness. Training, operational,
non-technical, and quality control personnel in aviation will find Beyond
Aviation Human Factors of interest, as will personnel in other high-technology
production industries.
Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents
James Reason
Ashgate Publishing Company, 1997.
Available from
Barnes and Noble
Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions
and Fiascoes
Irving L. Janis
Earlier edition
Houghton Mifflin, 1972.
Available from
Barnes and Noble
Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes
Irving L. Janis
In print and widely available
Houghton Mifflin Company, 1986.
Available from
Barnes and Noble
Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management
Irving L. Janis
Free Press, 1988.
Available from
Barnes and Noble
Culture at Work in Aviation and Medicine: National, Organizational
and Professional Influences
Robert L. Helmreich and Ashleigh C. Merritt
Ashgate Publishing Company, 1998.
Available from
Barnes and Noble
The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance
at NASA
Diane Vaughan
In print and widely available
University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Available from
Barnes and Noble
Safeware: System Safety and Computers
Nancy G. Leveson
Addison-Wesley, 1995.
Abstract at http://sunnyday.mit.edu/book.html
Friendly Fire
Scott A. Snook
Princeton University Press, 2000.
Available from Amazon
Books
An Audit by the HSE
on British Energy Generation Limited and British Energy Generation (UK)
Limited 1999.
United Kingdom Health and Safety Executive Summary
Videos
Collision Course: What are the odds?
Federal Aviation Administration
Length 19 minutes, 43 seconds
July 25, 2000.
Available from chpra@engr.wisc.edu
Spiral
To Disaster
Length 24:00
Coastal Training Technologies
Groupthink
LENGTH: 22 Min
CRM-learning
Safety Programs
Du Pont Safety Training Observation
Program (STOP)
Accountability Model and Policy Guidelines
In use at Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Pacific Gas and Electric.
Contact person: Lance Sawyer, (805) 545-3436, lrs1@pge.com
This Accountability Model is currently used at Diablo Canyon, and includes
a Culpability Evaluation Flow Chart. It is based in large part on the
work of James Reason as described in Chapter 9 of Managing the Risks
of Organizational Accidents. Of course, such a model must be carefully
developed with representation from all groups, and should be implemented
with using effective communication methods and normal change management
techniques. The Accountability Policy Guidelines are draft comments
that PLG plans to use to ensure all parties understand how to use the
basic model. Finally, the Accountability Policy Talk is a presentation
that was developed for supervisors at Diablo Canyon to use in explaining
the policy and how it will be used with subordinates.
NASA Aviation Safety Reporting
System (ASRS).
"Research Support
for the Power Industry," Issues in Science & Technology,
Fall 1998.
By M. G. Morgan and S. F. Tierney.
Unintended
Consequences: Energy R&D in a Deregulated Energy Market.
J.J. Dooley, Senior Research Engineer
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Washington, D.C. PNNL-SA-28561
February 6, 1997.
Federal Research:
Changes in Electricity-Related R&D Funding.
General Accounting Office. RCED-96-203
August 16, 1996.
|